Saturday, 29 June 2013

Homosexual propaganda in the world

Homosexual propaganda is so much intense in higly developed countries of the world during the last five years, that it looks more and more like homosexual dictatorship of the richest global states. In general homosexuality isn't something new for the humanity and homosexual persons had lived as 100 years ago as 1000 years ago, but only nowadays higly developed countries around the globe try to convince all Earth's population in the thesis that homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality, that it's almost the same - just a few another sexual orientation of the people. Even more, in 2013 different (mainly American, Canadian and British) media and sites, various psychological associations and politics started to discuss about phedophilia like about...just another human sexual orientation and about necessary to understand phedophiles and not to judge them, and phedophiles began to discuss in the internet the necessary of the equality between homosexualists and phedophiles rights in the societies. Then, there are many animal brothels! in the world, where zoophiles can satisfy their sexual desires with the animals, and as diverse people write, when animals aren't hurted, so all is normal and there is no problem in zoophilia. Though zoophiles and phedophiles lived in the past centuries, also as homosexualists lived then, but only in the XXIth century diverse globe's powerful people and some state powers try to convince others that all human sexual desires is ok, because when persons want, so...why not? In my opinion, people can't deceive human nature: heterosexuality and relations between woman and man are natural, and homosexuality, phedophilia and zoophilia are non-natural for human beings. But it's my strong opinion and the reader of the blog can not divide this my opinion. The existence of different opinions of the various persons creates democratic society. And it's really dangerous signals in higly developed states, when some, especially famous, heterosexual person openly says about own non-perception of homosexuality, same-sex marriages and adoption the children by gays as something normal and equal to heterosexual relations, so that heterosexual person can be very criticized and punished for such own non-perception, for example, can be discharged from the work's place. Sorry, but there is no freedom of speech, and it's not democracy, but it's homosexual dictatorship. My country Ukraine is often criticized by state powers of many richest countries that gays are discriminated here, but there is no discrimination of them: homosexualists are not discharged from the work, aren't jailed or beaten for their sexual orientation in Ukrainian state. Besides it's very private deal of anybody, if person is heterosexual or homosexual, and I don't understand why many countries' powers organize gay-prides, which are public event per 100%. Could it be normal event when all men of some country would organize the demonstration with slogans "We are men" or all women would exclaim on the streets "We are women"? Of course, that men are men and women are women, and all together they are not aliens. So why are heterosexual people forced to watch gay-pride, the public event of homosexual people, if sexual orientation is private deal of everyone?
And nowadays special educational programs about homosexuality function in the institutes, schools and even in the kinder-gardens of many higly developed states and it worries very much. Why do children of heterosexual people must to study about homosexuality as something normal and similar to heterosexuality, when their heterosexual parents suppose homosexuality non-normal? Where are freedom of belief and freedom of choice in these obligatory educational homosexual programs? No, there aren't. It's again homosexual dictatorship. And where is freedom of religion in the countries, which popularize and accept same-sex marriages' laws? Why are religions, Christianity and Islam the most, hugily critized for its non-perception of same-sex marriages in those countries, when homosexuality isn't normal and natural for human beigns according these religions? Then, only man and woman may continue human gender and all children need father's and mother's cares. Why can orphans be adopted by homosexual pairs and be forced to knowledge about homosexual relations without any possibility to grow up in heterosexual family and to have father and mother? Where is freedom of choice of these orphans?
At last, in the situation when higly developed global states lead big homosexual propaganda in the world and others states must accept such propaganda, not to criticize and not to ban it, just must shut up and be silent about own non-homosexual opinions, so it will be the truth when such situation will not be called democracy and fight for homosexual rights, but will be honestly named homosexual dictatorship.               

Saturday, 15 June 2013

"Femen" isn't movement for women's rights

"Femen" is movement of so-called feminists, which became widely known during the last years thanks to different world's media. Founded in 2008 in Kyiv, "Femen" began to be broad known in 2010, at first taking their actions in Ukraine, then - in other countries around the globe, and nowadays it's some international movement with its branches in many world' states. "Femen" members call themselves fighters for female rights, but all their past and present topless or naked actions were and are brutal and vulgar, which humiliate woman's essence, demonstrating women's protests as hysterical dull naked activity. Those of "Femen" don't protect any feminine rights, but dress in provocative manner more like prostitutes, than fighters for deciding of female problems in the world. Besides it they often dress the wreathes with ribbons, which are similar to Ukrainian wreathes, even if the members of "Femen" are Brazilian or Spanish. So that so-called feministic movement discriminates not only all feminists and women, but especially Ukrainian women and Ukraine. Of course, "Femen" never loved Ukraine and they humiliated this country as only could, also destroying or mocking at Ukrainian national symbols during their manifestations in Ukraine. The most outrageous "Femen" action in Ukraine was cutting of Catholic cross on August 17th, 2012 in Kyiv. This cross was placed by Ukrainian Greek Catholics in Kyiv in 2004 in the memory of the victims, killed by NKVS agents in Kyiv prisons, and "Femen" member Inna Shevchenko, the executor of cutting of the cross, explained such "Femen" action as support for Russian arrested Pussy Riot group. Ukrainian police opened criminal investigation into hooliganism against I.Shevchenko after her cutting of the cross, but she emigrated in Paris and created French branch of "Femen". You know what? It's very very difficult for Ukrainians to get visa in such country as France, but I.Shevchenko was welcomed as some hero in EU, particularly on French TV. Cutting of the cross wasn't feministic action of "Femen", no!, it was really anti-Cristian act, though past and present international activity of "Femen" is against Christianity and Islam and it's a big question why so-called "feminists" offend these two religions instead of real fighting for female rights. ?????... Another very big question is about the source of their financing, because only well financed movement can make so many trips around the world and can be interviewed in the famous world's media as "Femen" members can. ?????... "Femen" has its offices in Kyiv, Paris and Berlin, its German site and huge support of global TV and newspapers, such as Euronews, CNN, BBC, Deutche Welle, Der Spiegel, Le Figaro, Le Monde, The Guardian, The Independent, La Repubblica, Agency France Press and many German, French, British, Ukrainian, Russian, Italian, Polish, Swiss, Belgian, American, Australian and others media. It seems like some journalistic "duty" in the whole modern world to show "Femen" daily activity on the TV or to write about it in the newspapers. Wow! How many money must cost such media support! At least, "Femen" manifestators elementarily break public order and act as hooligans, offending or mocking at concrete persons or places, religious symbols, human feelings (often - religious feelings). Now "Femen" activists mainly take their activity in European Union, but don't get any punishment there - neither penalty, nor imprisonment in EU. Why?